Comments on Sreejith Panickar: Ayodhya verdict: What we didn't hear...

@Srijith Since it is a case that has been in the ...

2010-11-03T11:58:35.599+05:30

@Srijith

Since it is a case that has been in the court for a long time, and especially because it goes deep back into history, it is really difficult to get the facts and do the proper analysis. But my point is, both the Hindus and Muslims cannot have the possession of the same land. So, with the evidences that we have, the possession should have been decided by the court; either Hindus or Muslims.

Things are going good. Hope you too are doing great.

There is a problem with the rendering of my blog with some browsers. Firefox and IE 8 are okay. I thought it was appearing well on Chrome too. Need to check again. Thanks for that!

Sree, when posting comments, the text box to enter...

2010-11-02T12:07:13.370+05:30

Sree, when posting comments, the text box to enter word verification does not appear within the frame. I am using chrome.The only options is to select the comment and then press 'TAB'

I too felt let down by the verdict.. and thought i...

2010-11-02T12:05:35.229+05:30

I too felt let down by the verdict.. and thought it was too simplistic a solution.!But, but also realized I did not know much about the case itself. For instance, who Nirmohi Akhara is.? I therefore feel more comfortable in placing my trust in the judiciary of the nation.

How are things, sree..?

have Fun, Take Care and God Bless!

With Best Regards,
Srijith.

@Jack Absolutely Jack. People can cite this judgm...

2010-10-03T14:46:34.556+05:30

@Jack

Absolutely Jack. People can cite this judgment in the future and "substantiate" claims based on faith and belief.

The effect of this judgement will have some reperc...

2010-10-03T12:32:36.208+05:30

The effect of this judgement will have some repercussions in the interpretation of law in future as it considered "faith" and "belief". May be for many situtations, accused can arugue based on their "faith and belief".

@Suseelan What makes it the best possible verdict...

2010-10-01T23:03:40.901+05:30

@Suseelan

What makes it the best possible verdict? Because it didn't stir up the country? That is not what we expect from rules and laws. Everyone are almost happy now, because all of them were satisfied by the court. The intent of rules and laws is not to satisfy people. It is not for nothing that the eyes of the loddess are covered. Thanks for the comment...

Hello do not make unnecessary observations and con...

2010-10-01T11:27:10.083+05:30

Hello do not make unnecessary observations and conclusions. This is as far as the best possible judgement, if the structure was there such a verdict was impossible, the status quo would be different. Now if no fanatics and politicians try fishing in mud water, Waqf board and Hindu sabha will settle issues peacefully, Supreme court also wont take much delay as the verdict is clear, and Muslim judge has judged much in favour of Ram Lalla. Now 1/3 land of the place doesnt have any value for Muslims.

You are arguing that if the structure was not mosque why not handle that to Hindus, if the structure was there such a verdict wont come.

Muslims and Hindus have shown maturity, so we should maintain such dignity and restrain from digging at others, now even if Hindu or Muslim go to supreme court temple contsruction wont be much delayed. Hindus should be satisfied with that.